Rss

It appears to be to be used having specific verbs or even in good particular sense of the new verb


/bi-/ has been said for locative-terminative force in lieu of purely locative force to possess /ba-/, however, Thomsen states toward p. 184, this “is likely not automatically useful how come from concord which have a loc mousemingle reddit.-label. or loc. noun, it as an alternative caters to the latest semantic differentiation of one’s verb. “

>ba(I): features an effective separative mode. Within the OBGT it directly correlates that have >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, after the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >on Akkadian best.) Their position was after new ventive >marker yards and therefore the b are assimilated: m-ba- > m-ma, incase this is exactly >accompanied by a 2nd person pronoun, it becomes yards-ma > m-mu (very ba >isn’t necessarily straightforward to spot). On the absence of the fresh new >ventive marker they takes up the original condition regarding chain, immediately after which they >you should never always be distinguished out-of ba(II). A clear situation try >ba-ne-su8-be2-en-de3-dentro de = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = we disappear completely >on it (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): keeps good stative/passive function. Into the OBGT VI, it’s rendered because of the >a c-base stative/couch potato, otherwise a keen Nt-base couch potato. Frequently, ba(II) >occupies the initial reputation about chain. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-durante >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he has got been placed / I’ve been placed >(because of the someone unnamed). The fresh new forms ba-gar, ba-gar-re-dentro de, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-durante inside OBGT VI, traces 160-165, is unclear; they may be able >as an alternative become translated because ba(I), particularly the next show, >which is one or two-participant, and OB grammarian, just who made her or him >by the Nt-stalk passives, and maintained this new ambiguity. > >Their declaration clearly applies to ba(II), but I do not think it is just a >matter of taste, after one has set ba(I) aside. However, it is >way outside my personal info and you will my ability to test my personal a lot more than >syntactical/lexical claims from the unilingual messages. > >Using my sincerely, >Peter J. Huber

I was thinking of all intransitive sentences one to end with ba-Sources, such as ba-gul, “it actually was destroyed”. As you state, men and women fall in the category off ba(II).

I would possess believe it had been a great >Hebrew phrase, but once again, I don’t know the connection of the Sumerian >words additionally the Hebrew language

Thanks for finding the time to try to clarify which question. I could try to synopsis exactly what Hayes has on users 162 and you can 256: He agrees one to students provides speculated there tends to be a few ba- conjugation prefixes that are homonyms. “You’re viewed chiefly in the passive phrases, the other into the less definable contexts.” In addition to, the newest conjugation prefix bi2- sometimes occurs with moderate phrases regarding locative-terminative circumstances in addition to conjugation prefix ba- either happens having moderate phrases from the locative case. “It is this development out-of co-density which has provided numerous students to conclude one bi2- and you can ba- aren’t of the identical rank just like the other conjugation prefixes, and are also most likely comprising several ability.” Therefore you to form of ba- are priced between a feature you to is short for the new locative situation. To have good separative definition, you expect to locate Sumerian nominal phrases finish on the ablative postposition -ta.

Notice the new subtle differences >manufactured in OBGT VI, outlines 79-84, between the average Grams-stem stative >together with C-stalk stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he could be placed, I’m put, against

>I found myself wanting to know for individuals who you certainly will respond to a concern personally. You will find read someplace >that identity “Eden” try good Sumerian term. > >Anyway, in the event that Eden, Adam, and/otherwise Eve is Sumerian words, is it possible you >please let me know if they have an interpretation/meaning?

EDIN is actually a great Sumerian word, it is the steppe belongings among them rivers, where the herd pet grazed.

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 * が付いている欄は必須項目です


*


- Rental Orbit Space -